Home

Industry and Competitive Analysis

15 min read

Industry and Competitive Analysis

Learning Objectives Coverage

LO1: Describe the purposes of, and steps involved in, industry and competitive analysis

Core Concept

Industry and competitive analysis is the systematic study of industry structural factors, competitive dynamics, and market forces to understand profitability drivers and competitive positioning. It determines whether company performance is driven by industry-wide factors or company-specific advantages — a distinction critical for accurate valuation and forecasting. The key components are industry definition, size and growth assessment, profitability analysis, competitive forces evaluation, and competitive positioning.

Formulas & Calculations

  • Main formula: Industry Growth Rate = (Industry Size_t - Industry Size_t-1) / Industry Size_t-1 × 100%
  • HP 12C steps: 
    [Old Value] ENTER
[New Value] Δ%
  • Common variations: CAGR for multi-year growth, volume vs. value growth decomposition

Practical Examples

  • Traditional Finance Example: Analyzing the global pharmaceutical industry ($1.5 trillion market) growing at 5% annually, with patent cliffs affecting profitability
  • Calculation walkthrough:
    • 2023 pharma sales: $1,500B
    • 2024 pharma sales: $1,575B
    • Growth = (1,500B) / $1,500B = 5%
  • Interpretation: Industry growth exceeds GDP, suggesting structural growth drivers beyond economic expansion

DeFi Application defi-application

Analyzing the DEX sector (Uniswap, Curve, Balancer) as an industry within DeFi requires tracking total TVL, volume, and fee revenue across protocols. Real-time on-chain data makes this analysis more transparent than traditional industry research, but defining industry boundaries becomes difficult when protocols offer multiple services. A DEX might also function as a lending platform, derivatives venue, and governance system simultaneously — challenging the traditional classification frameworks discussed in LO2.

LO2: Describe industry classification methods and compare methods by which companies can be grouped

Core Concept

Industry classification systems group companies based on similar products, services, or business activities using hierarchical taxonomies. Classification enables peer comparison, performance benchmarking, and identification of industry-specific risk factors. The major systems are GICS (Global Industry Classification Standard), ICB (Industry Classification Benchmark), and TRBC (The Refinitiv Business Classification), each organizing companies into sectors, industry groups, industries, and sub-industries. For multi-segment companies, the >50% revenue rule typically determines primary classification.

Formulas & Calculations

  • Main formula: Classification typically uses >50% revenue rule for multi-segment companies
  • HP 12C steps: Not applicable for classification
  • Common variations: Asset-based, profit-based, or market perception-based classification

Practical Examples

  • Traditional Finance Example: Amazon classified as Consumer Discretionary despite AWS generating majority of profits
  • Classification hierarchy:
    • Sector: Consumer Discretionary
    • Industry Group: Consumer Services
    • Industry: Internet & Direct Marketing Retail
    • Sub-Industry: Internet Retail
  • Interpretation: Single classification can mask multi-industry operations

DeFi Application defi-application

Compound protocol illustrates the classification challenge acutely — is it a lending protocol, a governance token, or infrastructure? DeFi protocols like MakerDAO often defy traditional classification entirely, since MakerDAO simultaneously operates as a lending platform, a stablecoin issuer, and a governance system. The choice between functional classification (DEX, lending, derivatives) and technical architecture (L1, L2, middleware) remains an open question for DeFi analysts.

Core Concept exam-focus formula

Quantitative assessment of industry metrics including total addressable market (TAM), growth patterns, profit margins, and competitive dynamics. This establishes baseline expectations for company performance and identifies the industry lifecycle stage. Key metrics include revenue/volume, growth decomposition, margin analysis, and concentration measures like the HHI.

Formulas & Calculations

  • Main formula: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) = Σ(Market Share_i)²
  • HP 12C steps: 
    [Share1] ENTER 2 y^x
[Share2] ENTER 2 y^x +
[Share3] ENTER 2 y^x +
...continue for all firms
  • Common variations: CR4 (four-firm concentration ratio), market share evolution tracking

Practical Examples

  • Traditional Finance Example: US airline industry HHI calculation
    • American: 20%, Delta: 18%, United: 16%, Southwest: 17%
    • HHI = 20² + 18² + 16² + 17² + (others) = 400 + 324 + 256 + 289 = 1,269+
  • Interpretation: Moderately concentrated industry (HHI 1,500-2,500), suggesting competitive dynamics

DeFi Application defi-application

DEX market concentration can be analyzed using TVL-based market share. For example, with Uniswap at 40% (50B total), Curve at 25% (5B), the HHI is approximately 2,500 (1,600 + 625 + 100 + remaining firms), indicating a highly concentrated market. Real-time TVL tracking via DeFiLlama enables continuous monitoring, though liquidity fragmentation across chains can distort single-chain market share figures. Volume-based and TVL-based measures can tell different stories about competitive dynamics.

LO4: Analyze an industry’s structure and external influences using Porter’s Five Forces and PESTLE frameworks

Core Concept exam-focus

Porter’s Five Forces analyzes competitive intensity through five structural factors, while PESTLE examines Political, Economic (see Economics), Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental external influences. Together they identify sources of competitive advantage and external risks/opportunities affecting industry profitability.

Formulas & Calculations

  • Main formula: Industry Profit Potential = f(inverse of Five Forces intensity)
  • HP 12C steps: Qualitative framework, limited calculations
  • Common variations: Extended models including complementors, government as sixth force

Practical Examples

  • Traditional Finance Example: Streaming video industry analysis
    • High threat of new entrants (low barriers)
    • High buyer power (easy switching)
    • Moderate supplier power (content creators)
    • High rivalry (Netflix, Disney+, HBO)
    • Result: Declining industry profitability
  • Interpretation: Intense competition drives content spending arms race

DeFi Application defi-application

Applying Porter’s Five Forces to DeFi lending protocols reveals extreme competitive intensity on nearly every dimension. The threat of new entrants is extreme because code is forkable and open-source. Buyer power is extreme — users can switch protocols instantly with no lock-in. Supplier power from liquidity providers is high, since capital is highly mobile. The threat of substitutes (new protocols, CeFi alternatives) is high. Rivalry is extreme, with protocols competing aggressively on interest rates. Defensive moats include smart contract complexity, governance token incentives, and network effects — but the fundamental openness of DeFi means commoditization pressure is relentless.

LO5: Evaluate the competitive strategy and position of a company

Core Concept exam-focus

Assessment of a company’s strategic approach (cost leadership, differentiation, focus) and its execution capability relative to competitors. This determines the sustainability of competitive advantages and the likelihood of generating economic profits — the ROIC vs. WACC framework from company analysis applied through a strategic lens.

Formulas & Calculations

  • Main formula: Economic Profit = (ROIC - WACC) × Invested Capital
  • HP 12C steps: 
    [ROIC] ENTER
[WACC] -
[Invested Capital] ×
  • Common variations: EVA, market value added, competitive advantage period (CAP)

Practical Examples

  • Traditional Finance Example: Walmart’s cost leadership strategy
    • Scale economies: 10,500+ stores
    • Bargaining power: $600B+ revenue
    • Supply chain efficiency: 2.3% operating margin advantage
    • Result: Sustainable competitive advantage in discount retail
  • Interpretation: Cost advantages create barriers to competition

DeFi Application defi-application

Uniswap exemplifies a differentiation strategy in DeFi. Its first-mover advantage in AMM design, network effects from deep liquidity, strong brand recognition, extensive integrations, and V3 concentrated liquidity innovation collectively create a competitive position. Implementation strategies include protocol-owned liquidity, fee tier optimization, and cross-chain expansion. However, because all code is open-source, the protocol remains vulnerable to vampire attacks and forks — a competitive dynamic unique to DeFi that has no traditional finance equivalent.

Core Concepts Summary (80/20 Principle)

Must-Know Concepts

  1. Porter’s Five Forces: Framework determining industry profitability through competitive dynamics assessment
  2. HHI Calculation: Sum of squared market shares measuring industry concentration (>2,500 = highly concentrated)
  3. Generic Strategies: Cost leadership vs. differentiation vs. focus as primary competitive approaches
  4. Industry Life Cycle: Growth → Mature → Decline stages affecting competitive dynamics
  5. Network Effects: Value increases with users, creating competitive moats (critical in DeFi)

Quick Reference Table

ConceptFormulaWhen to UseDeFi Equivalent
Market ShareCompany Revenue / Industry RevenueCompetitive position assessmentProtocol TVL / Total Category TVL
HHIΣ(Market Share_i)²Industry concentration analysisTVL or Volume concentration
Growth Rate(New - Old) / Old × 100%Industry dynamics evaluationTVL or user growth metrics
Five ForcesQualitative assessmentIndustry attractivenessProtocol competitive analysis
ROIC vs WACCROIC - WACCEconomic profit determinationProtocol revenue vs. token inflation

Comprehensive Formula Sheet formula

Essential Formulas

Formula 1: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI)
HHI = Σ(s_i)² for all firms i
Where: s_i = market share of firm i (as whole number, not decimal)
Used for: Measuring market concentration
Interpretation:
- HHI < 1,500: Unconcentrated
- 1,500 ≤ HHI ≤ 2,500: Moderately concentrated  
- HHI > 2,500: Highly concentrated

Formula 2: Industry Growth Rate
g = (Revenue_t - Revenue_t-1) / Revenue_t-1 × 100%
Where: t = current period, t-1 = previous period
Used for: Assessing industry expansion/contraction

Formula 3: Market Share
MS = Company Metric / Total Industry Metric × 100%
Where: Metric = revenue, units, TVL, volume, etc.
Used for: Competitive positioning analysis

Formula 4: Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)
CAGR = (Ending Value / Beginning Value)^(1/n) - 1
Where: n = number of years
Used for: Long-term growth assessment

Formula 5: Economic Profit
Economic Profit = (ROIC - WACC) × Invested Capital
Where: ROIC = Return on Invested Capital, WACC = Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Used for: Evaluating value creation

HP 12C Calculator Sequences

Operation 1: HHI Calculation
Example: Market shares 30%, 25%, 20%, 15%, 10%
30 ENTER 2 y^x → 900
25 ENTER 2 y^x → 625 +
20 ENTER 2 y^x → 400 +
15 ENTER 2 y^x → 225 +
10 ENTER 2 y^x → 100 +
Result: 2,250

Operation 2: Growth Rate
Example: Year 1 = $100M, Year 2 = $115M
100 ENTER
115 Δ%
Result: 15%

Operation 3: CAGR (3 years)
Example: Start $100M, End $133.1M
100 ENTER
133.1 ÷
3 1/x y^x
1 -
100 ×
Result: 10%

Operation 4: Economic Profit
Example: ROIC = 15%, WACC = 10%, Capital = $1B
15 ENTER
10 -
1000 ×
Result: $50M economic profit

Practice Problems

Basic Level (Understanding)

  1. Problem: Calculate the HHI for an industry with three firms having 50%, 30%, and 20% market share

    • Given: Market shares: Firm A = 50%, Firm B = 30%, Firm C = 20%
    • Find: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index
    • Solution:
      • HHI = 50² + 30² + 20²
      • HHI = 2,500 + 900 + 400
      • HHI = 3,800
    • Answer: HHI = 3,800 (highly concentrated industry)

  2. Problem: A DeFi lending protocol has 2B total lending market

    • Given: Protocol TVL = 2B
    • Find: Market share
    • Solution: Market Share = 2,000M × 100% = 25%
    • Answer: 25% market share

  3. Problem: Classify a company with revenues: 40% cloud services, 35% e-commerce, 25% advertising

    • Given: Multi-segment revenue breakdown
    • Find: Primary industry classification
    • Solution: No segment >50%, use discretion based on profits or market perception
    • Answer: Requires additional data (profits, assets) or management guidance

Intermediate Level (Application)

  1. Problem: Analyze competitive dynamics in DEX market with Uniswap (10B), and others ($10B total)

    • Given: Uniswap = 10B, Others = 40B)
    • Find: HHI and market structure assessment
    • Solution:
      • Uniswap share = 20/40 = 50%
      • Curve share = 10/40 = 25%
      • Others = 25% (assume 5% each for 5 others)
      • HHI = 50² + 25² + 5×(5²) = 2,500 + 625 + 125 = 3,250
    • Answer: HHI = 3,250 (highly concentrated), Uniswap has dominant position with network effects

  2. Problem: Evaluate cost leadership strategy for a discount broker with 0.1% trading fees vs. industry average 0.5%

    • Given: Company fee = 0.1%, Industry average = 0.5%, Market size = $10B daily volume
    • Find: Competitive advantage and required volume for profitability
    • Solution:
      • Fee advantage = 0.5% - 0.1% = 0.4% = 40 bps
      • To match industry profit on 5B volume at 0.1% to equal $1B at 0.5%
    • Answer: 80% cost advantage requires 5× volume to maintain absolute profits

  3. Problem: Apply Porter’s Five Forces to evaluate a new L1 blockchain entering the market

    • Given: Ethereum dominates with 70% DeFi TVL, Solana 15%, BSC 10%, others 5%
    • Find: Industry attractiveness assessment
    • Solution:
      • New entrants: MODERATE (technical barriers, need ecosystem)
      • Buyer power: HIGH (developers/users can easily switch)
      • Supplier power: MODERATE (validator requirements)
      • Substitutes: HIGH (many L1/L2 alternatives)
      • Rivalry: HIGH (aggressive incentive programs)
    • Answer: Challenging entry, requires significant differentiation or focus strategy

Advanced Level (Analysis)

  1. Problem: Comprehensive Five Forces analysis for a new DeFi derivatives protocol entering the market

    • Given:
      • Existing players: dYdX (40% share), GMX (30%), Others (30%)
      • Current market size: $50B monthly volume
      • Average fees: 0.1% (10 bps)
      • Required liquidity for launch: $100M
    • Find: Industry attractiveness and competitive strategy recommendation
    • Solution:
      • Five Forces Analysis:
        • New entrants: HIGH (low barriers, forkable code)
        • Buyer power: HIGH (easy switching, price transparency)
        • Supplier power: HIGH (LPs can move instantly)
        • Substitutes: MODERATE (CEX alternatives, different derivative types)
        • Rivalry: HIGH (price competition on fees)
      • Industry profitability: LOW (intense competition)
      • HHI = 40² + 30² + 30² = 1,600 + 900 + 900 = 3,400 (concentrated but contested)
    • Answer: Despite high concentration, low barriers and high competitive forces suggest differentiation strategy needed (unique products, better UX, or focus on specific user segment)

  2. Problem: Evaluate competitive positioning of stablecoin issuer with 15% market share

    • Given:
      • Market shares: USDT (45%), USDC (25%), Issuer (15%), DAI (10%), Others (5%)
      • Issuer’s ROIC: 8%, WACC: 5%, Invested Capital: $500M
      • Industry average ROIC: 6%
    • Find: Economic profit and competitive advantage assessment
    • Solution:
      • HHI = 45² + 25² + 15² + 10² + 5² = 2,025 + 625 + 225 + 100 + 25 = 3,000
      • Economic Profit = (8% - 5%) × 15M
      • Industry Economic Profit = (6% - 5%) × Capital = positive but lower
    • Answer: Highly concentrated market, issuer has competitive advantage (ROIC > industry), generating $15M economic profit

DeFi Applications & Real-World Examples

Traditional Finance Context

  • Institution Example: Investment banks use Porter’s Five Forces to evaluate M&A targets’ industry positioning
  • Market Application: Airline industry consolidation driven by unfavorable Five Forces (high rivalry, low profitability)
  • Historical Case: Amazon’s transformation from online bookstore to platform demonstrating successful differentiation evolution

DeFi Parallels

  • Protocol Implementation: Curve’s focus strategy (stablecoin/pegged asset specialist) vs. Uniswap’s broad differentiation
  • Smart Contract Logic: Concentrated liquidity (Uniswap V3) as technical differentiation creating capital efficiency moat
  • Advantages: Transparent competitive metrics, permissionless innovation, global market access
  • Limitations: Code forkability, lack of traditional IP protection, regulatory uncertainty

Case Studies

  1. Case 1: SushiSwap Vampire Attack on Uniswap (2020) case-study

    • Background: SushiSwap forked Uniswap and offered SUSHI tokens to migrate liquidity
    • Analysis:
      • Demonstrated extreme “threat of new entrants” in DeFi
      • $1B+ liquidity migrated in days
      • Forced Uniswap to launch UNI token
    • Outcomes: Both protocols survived, market expanded
    • Lessons learned: First-mover advantage insufficient without token incentives

  2. Case 2: Compound vs. Aave Competition case-study

    • Background: Two leading lending protocols competing for market share
    • Analysis:
      • Similar core functionality (lending/borrowing)
      • Differentiation through features (flash loans, credit delegation)
      • Network effects from liquidity depth
    • Outcomes: Market supported multiple winners
    • Lessons learned: Feature innovation and multi-chain expansion as differentiation

  3. Case 3: Ethereum L2 Scaling Solutions Competition case-study

    • Background: Multiple L2s competing for Ethereum scaling market
    • Analysis using Five Forces:
      • New entrants: MODERATE (technical complexity)
      • User power: HIGH (bridge assets easily)
      • Developer power: MODERATE (need ecosystem support)
      • Substitutes: HIGH (alternative L1s, other L2s)
      • Rivalry: INTENSE (incentive wars)
    • Outcomes: Arbitrum and Optimism leading, others finding niches
    • Lessons learned: Ecosystem development more important than technical superiority

Common Pitfalls & Exam Tips

Frequent Mistakes

  • Mistake 1: Calculating HHI with decimal market shares (use whole numbers: 50, not 0.50)
  • Mistake 2: Confusing industry classification systems (GICS vs. ICB hierarchies)
  • Mistake 3: Ignoring multi-industry companies in market share calculations
  • Mistake 4: Missing external factors in PESTLE analysis
  • Mistake 5: Applying wrong generic strategy to industry context

Exam Strategy

  • Time management: 1.5 minutes per question average, save Five Forces questions for end if time-constrained
  • Question patterns:
    • Often combine HHI calculation with interpretation
    • Five Forces with strategy recommendation
    • Classification challenges for multi-segment companies
  • Quick checks:
    • HHI must be ≥100 (minimum one firm with 10%)
    • Sum of market shares must = 100%
    • Five Forces all point to rivalry intensity

Key Takeaways

Essential Points

✓ Industry analysis determines baseline profitability and growth expectations for companies ✓ Porter’s Five Forces determines industry structural profitability - high force intensity = low profits ✓ HHI > 2,500 indicates high concentration, but doesn’t guarantee low competition (especially in DeFi) ✓ Generic strategies: cost leadership (scale/efficiency), differentiation (unique value), focus (niche domination) ✓ DeFi protocols face extreme competitive forces due to forkability and capital mobility

Memory Aids

  • Mnemonic: “BBRST” for Five Forces (Buyers, Barriers/new entrants, Rivalry, Substitutes, Suppliers)
  • Visual: Five Forces as arrows pointing inward to industry profitability circle
  • Analogy: Industry analysis like evaluating a sports league - who are the players, what are the rules, how intense is competition
  • PESTLE: “PESTLE makes industries SETTLE” (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, Environmental)

Cross-References & Additional Resources

Source Materials

  • Primary Reading: Finance Volume 5, Reading 24
  • Key Sections: Porter’s Five Forces (p. 266-270), PESTLE Analysis (p. 271-274)
  • Practice Questions: End-of-chapter problems 1-8

External Resources

  • Videos: Porter’s Five Forces Explained (Harvard Business Review)
  • Articles: “DeFi Competitive Landscape” - Messari Research
  • Tools:
    • DeFiLlama for real-time TVL tracking
    • Dune Analytics for market share dashboards
    • Token Terminal for protocol revenue metrics

Review Checklist

Before moving on, ensure you can:

  • Explain the five steps of industry and competitive analysis
  • Calculate HHI without reference and interpret the result
  • Complete a Five Forces analysis in under 5 minutes
  • Identify appropriate generic strategy based on industry structure
  • Apply industry analysis concepts to both TradFi and DeFi contexts
  • Distinguish between industry-wide and firm-specific performance drivers
  • Use PESTLE to identify external opportunities and threats
  • Calculate and interpret market share and growth metrics
  • Evaluate competitive positioning using economic profit framework
  • Recognize industry life cycle stage from growth and profitability patterns

Graph View

Backlinks