Equity Valuation: Concepts and Basic Tools
Learning Objectives Coverage
LO1: Evaluate whether a security, given its current market price and a value estimate, is overvalued, fairly valued, or undervalued by the market
Core Concept
Security valuation assessment compares an analyst’s estimated intrinsic value with the current market price to determine if a security is mispriced. Identifying mispriced securities is the foundation of value investing and active portfolio management — though the viability of this approach depends on one’s assumptions about market efficiency. exam-focus valuation
Key components:
- Intrinsic (fundamental) value: Based on analysis of investment fundamentals using company analysis and forecasting
- Market price: Current trading price in the market
- Valuation conclusion: Undervalued (buy), fairly valued (hold), or overvalued (sell)
Formulas & Calculations
- Main formula:
- If V₀ > P₀ → Undervalued (Buy signal)
- If V₀ = P₀ → Fairly valued (Hold)
- If V₀ < P₀ → Overvalued (Sell signal)
- Margin of safety: (V₀ - P₀) / P₀ × 100%
- HP 12C steps: Not applicable for this conceptual framework
Practical Examples
- Traditional Finance Example: Stock XYZ trades at 65
- Calculation walkthrough:
- Margin of safety = (50) / $50 = 30%
- Conclusion: Stock is undervalued by 30%
- Interpretation: Strong buy signal with significant upside potential
DeFi Application defi-application
Valuing the UNI token involves estimating intrinsic value from protocol revenue and comparing it to the market price. Smart contracts can automate valuation metrics calculation from on-chain data, providing transparent, real-time inputs. The key challenge is determining appropriate discount rates for tokens, which lack the established risk models (CAPM, Fama-French) available for traditional equity securities. This is an area where DeFi valuation is still evolving.
LO2: Describe major categories of equity valuation models
Core Concept exam-focus valuation
Three main approaches to equity valuation exist: present value models, multiplier models, and asset-based models. Different models suit different companies and situations; using multiple approaches provides validation (a concept sometimes called “valuation triangulation”).
Key categories:
- Present Value Models (DCF): Based on discounted future cash flows — the most theoretically sound approach, relying on forecasted cash flows
- Multiplier Models: Based on market multiples of comparable companies from industry analysis
- Asset-Based Models: Based on net asset values from financial statements
Formulas & Calculations
- Present Value: V₀ = Σ(CFt/(1+r)^t)
- Multiplier: V₀ = Multiple × Fundamental Variable
- Asset-Based: V₀ = Assets - Liabilities - Preferred Stock
Practical Examples
- Traditional Finance Example: Valuing Apple using DCF, P/E multiples, and book value
- Calculation walkthrough:
- DCF: $150 per share
- P/E approach: 25 × 150
- Asset-based: Not suitable for tech companies
- Interpretation: Convergence of methods increases confidence
DeFi Application defi-application
Valuing MakerDAO illustrates all three approaches in a DeFi context. DCF analysis discounts the present value of stability fees. Multiplier analysis compares TVL/Market Cap ratios across lending protocols. Asset-based valuation examines DAI collateral minus liabilities. On-chain transparency enables real-time valuation updates — a significant advantage over the quarterly reporting cycle of traditional equities.
LO3: Describe regular cash dividends, extra dividends, stock dividends, stock splits, reverse stock splits, and share repurchases
Core Concept
Corporations use various methods to distribute value to shareholders or adjust share structure. Understanding these corporate actions is essential for accurate valuation and investment analysis, particularly when comparing companies with different payout policies. Cash distributions include regular dividends and special (extra) dividends. Share adjustments encompass stock dividends, stock splits, and reverse splits. Capital returns take the form of share repurchases, which reduce shares outstanding and increase EPS. See Corporate Issuers for payout policy analysis.
Formulas & Calculations
- Stock split adjustment: New shares = Old shares × Split ratio
- Stock dividend: New shares = Old shares × (1 + Stock dividend %)
- Post-split price: New price = Old price / Split ratio
Practical Examples
- Traditional Finance Example: Company announces 2-for-1 stock split
- Calculation walkthrough:
- Pre-split: 100 shares at 10,000 value
- Post-split: 200 shares at 10,000 value
- Interpretation: No economic effect, just accounting change
DeFi Application defi-application
Token burns function similarly to share buybacks, reducing supply and theoretically increasing per-token value. Airdrops serve a role analogous to stock dividends, distributing additional tokens to existing holders. Smart contracts execute automatic token burns when predefined conditions are met, offering transparent and automated execution. However, tax treatment remains uncertain in many jurisdictions — a regulatory gap that makes DeFi corporate actions more complex than their traditional equivalents.
LO4: Describe dividend payment chronology
Core Concept
The dividend payment process follows a specific chronology from declaration to payment, and understanding this timing affects trading decisions and dividend capture strategies. The declaration date is when the board announces the dividend. The ex-dividend date is when the share begins trading without the dividend right — buying on or after this date means the buyer does not receive the upcoming dividend. The record date determines ownership eligibility (typically 1-2 business days after the ex-date). The payment date is when the actual distribution occurs.
Formulas & Calculations
- Ex-dividend price adjustment: P(ex-div) ≈ P(cum-div) - Dividend
- Days between dates: Typically 1-2 business days from ex-date to record date
Practical Examples
- Traditional Finance Example: Stock trading at 2 dividend
- Calculation walkthrough:
- Cum-dividend price: $50
- Ex-dividend price: $48 (approximately)
- Interpretation: Buy before ex-date to receive dividend
DeFi Application defi-application
In DeFi, snapshot voting and reward distribution replace the traditional dividend chronology. Block height snapshots determine eligible token holders, serving the same function as a record date but with instant, transparent record-keeping on-chain. The advantage is elimination of the settlement lag inherent in traditional equity markets. The challenge is MEV attacks around snapshot blocks, where sophisticated actors can acquire tokens just before a snapshot to capture rewards and sell immediately after.
LO5: Explain the rationale for using present value models to value equity and describe the dividend discount and free-cash-flow-to-equity models
Core Concept exam-focus formula valuation
Present value models value securities based on discounted expected future cash flows. This is the most theoretically sound approach, grounded in the time value of money concepts from Quantitative Methods. The key components are time value of money, expected future cash flows (from forecasting), and an appropriate discount rate.
Formulas & Calculations
- DDM: V₀ = Σ(Dt/(1+r)^t)
- FCFE Model: V₀ = Σ(FCFEt/(1+r)^t)
- FCFE Calculation: FCFE = CFO - FCInv + Net borrowing
- HP 12C steps:
CF₀ = 0 CF₁ = D₁ [g] [CFj] CF₂ = D₂ [g] [CFj] ... i = r [g] [i] [f] [NPV]
Practical Examples
- Traditional Finance Example: Value stock with $2 dividend growing at 5%, r = 10%
- Calculation walkthrough:
- V₀ = D₁/(r-g) = 42
- Interpretation: Stock worth $42 based on dividend stream
DeFi Application defi-application
Valuing the SUSHI token based on xSUSHI staking rewards provides a direct DeFi application of the DDM. Smart contracts distribute protocol fees to stakers, creating a transparent, verifiable dividend stream. The DDM maps naturally: staking rewards serve as dividends, and the required return reflects the token’s risk premium. The main challenge is the high volatility in protocol revenues, which makes growth rate estimation far more uncertain than for traditional dividend-paying stocks.
LO6: Explain advantages and disadvantages of each category of valuation model
Core Concept
- Definition: Each valuation approach has specific strengths and weaknesses affecting its applicability
- Why it matters: Choosing appropriate models for specific situations improves valuation accuracy
- Key components:
- Model assumptions and requirements
- Data availability and quality
- Company/asset characteristics
Formulas & Calculations
- Not applicable - conceptual framework
Practical Examples
- Traditional Finance Example:
- Tech startup: Multiplier models (no profits yet)
- Utility company: DDM (stable dividends)
- Real estate company: Asset-based (tangible assets)
DeFi Application
- Protocol example:
- New protocols: Multiplier models (TVL ratios)
- Established protocols: DCF models (fee streams)
- Lending protocols: Asset-based (loan book value)
- Implementation: Different models for different protocol types
- Advantages/Challenges: Model selection crucial for accurate token valuation
LO7: Calculate the intrinsic value of a non-callable, non-convertible preferred stock
Core Concept exam-focus formula valuation
Preferred stock with fixed dividends is valued as a perpetuity — the simplest equity valuation case and a foundation for understanding more complex securities. The approach parallels fixed income valuation but without a maturity date.
Formulas & Calculations
- Perpetual preferred: V₀ = D/r
- With maturity: V₀ = Σ(Dt/(1+r)^t) + F/(1+r)
- HP 12C steps:
For perpetual: D [ENTER] r [÷]
Practical Examples
- Traditional Finance Example: $100 par preferred, 5.5% dividend, r = 6%
- Calculation walkthrough:
- Annual dividend = 5.50
- V₀ = 91.67
- Interpretation: Trading below par due to required return exceeding dividend rate
DeFi Application
- Protocol example: Perpetual protocol tokens with fixed reward rates
- Implementation: Smart contracts ensuring fixed distribution rates
- Advantages/Challenges:
- Advantage: Programmable, guaranteed payments
- Challenge: Protocol sustainability concerns
LO8: Calculate and interpret the intrinsic value of an equity security based on the Gordon (constant) growth dividend discount model or a two-stage dividend discount model, as appropriate
Core Concept exam-focus formula valuation
The Gordon model assumes constant dividend growth, while the two-stage model allows for changing growth rates. These are the most practical DDM applications for valuing dividend-paying stocks. The sustainable growth rate (g = b x ROE) connects back to company analysis and the ROE framework.
Formulas & Calculations
- Gordon Model: V₀ = D₁/(r-g) = D₀(1+g)/(r-g)
- Two-Stage: V₀ = Σ[D₀(1+gs)^t/(1+r)^t] + [Dn+1/(r-gL)]/(1+r)
- Sustainable growth: g = b × ROE
- HP 12C steps:
Gordon: D₁ [ENTER] r [ENTER] g [-] [÷] Two-stage: Use CF register for high-growth dividends, add terminal value
Practical Examples
- Traditional Finance Example: Stock pays $2 dividend, g = 5%, r = 10%
- Calculation walkthrough:
- Gordon: V₀ = 42
- Two-stage (5 years 10%, then 5%): Calculate each dividend, discount, sum
- Interpretation: Higher near-term growth increases present value
DeFi Application defi-application
Valuing governance tokens with growing fee distributions maps directly to the Gordon and two-stage DDM frameworks. On-chain data enables real-time growth rate calculations from historical fee trends. The advantage is instant access to updated growth assumptions; the challenge is extreme volatility in growth rates, which can make the Gordon model’s constant-growth assumption unrealistic for most DeFi tokens. Two-stage models are generally more appropriate for newer protocols transitioning from high growth to maturity.
LO9: Identify characteristics of companies for which the constant growth or a multistage dividend discount model is appropriate
Core Concept
Different DDM variations suit companies at different industry lifecycle stages, and model misapplication leads to valuation errors. Company maturity and growth phase, dividend stability and predictability, and industry characteristics all determine which model is appropriate. The Gordon constant-growth model works best for mature, stable dividend payers, while multistage models are needed for companies with changing growth trajectories.
Formulas & Calculations
- Not applicable - selection criteria framework
Practical Examples
- Gordon Model Appropriate:
- Utilities with stable 3% dividend growth
- Consumer staples with predictable cash flows
- REITs with mandated distributions
- Multistage Appropriate:
- Tech companies transitioning to maturity
- Pharmaceuticals with patent cliffs
- Cyclical companies
DeFi Application
- Protocol example:
- Constant: Established DEXs with stable fee generation
- Multistage: New protocols with high initial growth
- Implementation: Protocol lifecycle analysis for model selection
- Advantages/Challenges: Rapid protocol evolution requires frequent reassessment
LO10: Explain the rationale for using price multiples to value equity, how the price to earnings multiple relates to fundamentals, and the use of multiples based on comparables
Core Concept exam-focus valuation
Relative valuation uses market multiples of similar companies, grounded in the law of one price. It is the quickest valuation method and is widely used by practitioners, particularly for peer comparison. Key components include comparable company selection and multiple normalization.
Formulas & Calculations
- P/E from fundamentals: P₀/E₁ = (Payout ratio)/(r-g)
- Justified P/E: Based on company fundamentals
- Relative P/E: Company P/E / Benchmark P/E
Practical Examples
- Traditional Finance Example: Tech company P/E = 30, Industry P/E = 25
- Calculation walkthrough:
- Relative P/E = 30/25 = 1.20
- Premium = 20% above industry
- Interpretation: Company trades at premium, investigate reasons
DeFi Application
- Protocol example: P/E ratios for fee-generating protocols
- Implementation: Automated multiple calculations from on-chain data
- Advantages/Challenges:
- Advantage: Real-time multiple updates
- Challenge: Limited comparable protocols
LO11: Calculate and interpret the following multiples: price to earnings, price to an estimate of operating cash flow, price to sales, and price to book value
Core Concept exam-focus formula valuation
Key valuation multiples use different fundamental metrics from financial statement analysis. Different multiples suit different situations:
- Earnings-based: P/E ratio (most common, requires positive earnings)
- Cash flow-based: P/CF ratio (less susceptible to accounting manipulation)
- Revenue-based: P/S ratio (useful when earnings are negative)
- Asset-based: P/B ratio (useful for asset-heavy businesses)
Formulas & Calculations
- P/E: Stock Price / EPS
- P/CF: Stock Price / Cash Flow per Share
- P/S: Stock Price / Sales per Share
- P/B: Stock Price / Book Value per Share
- HP 12C steps: Simple division calculations
Practical Examples
- Traditional Finance Example: Stock at 2, Sales/share 25
- Calculation walkthrough:
- P/E = 2 = 25x
- P/S = 20 = 2.5x
- P/B = 25 = 2.0x
- Interpretation: Compare to industry averages for relative valuation
DeFi Application defi-application
DeFi protocol valuation uses adapted multiples. P/E applies to MakerDAO’s price relative to stability fee earnings. P/S applies to Uniswap’s price relative to trading fee revenue. P/TVL (price to total value locked) is a DeFi-native metric with no traditional equivalent. Smart contract queries enable real-time metric calculation. The advantage is transparent, verifiable data; the challenge is that many protocols lack the earnings history or comparable peers needed for reliable multiple-based valuation.
LO12: Describe enterprise value multiples and their use in estimating equity value
Core Concept exam-focus formula valuation
Enterprise value multiples value the entire firm, not just equity, allowing comparison of companies with different capital structures (see Corporate Issuers). Key components include enterprise value calculation, EBITDA and other firm-level metrics, and capital structure neutrality.
Formulas & Calculations
- EV: Market Cap + Debt + Preferred - Cash
- EV/EBITDA: Enterprise Value / EBITDA
- Equity Value: EV - Debt - Preferred + Cash
Practical Examples
- Traditional Finance Example: Company with 300M debt, $100M cash
- Calculation walkthrough:
- EV = 300M - 1,200M
- If EBITDA = $200M, EV/EBITDA = 6x
- Interpretation: Compare to industry EV/EBITDA for relative value
DeFi Application defi-application
Valuing DeFi protocols with treasury assets requires adapting the EV formula: EV = Token Market Cap + Protocol Debt - Treasury Holdings. This captures full protocol value and enables comparison across protocols with different treasury sizes. The main challenge is defining “debt” in a DeFi context — outstanding stablecoin liabilities (for protocols like MakerDAO) or locked incentive emissions may qualify, but no standardized accounting framework yet exists.
LO13: Describe asset-based valuation models and their use in estimating equity value
Core Concept valuation
Valuation based on net asset values rather than earnings or cash flows. This approach provides a floor value, especially useful for asset-heavy companies and alternative investments like real estate. It relies on fair value estimation from financial statement analysis.
Formulas & Calculations
- Basic formula: Equity Value = Assets - Liabilities - Preferred Stock
- Adjustments: Book values → Fair/market values
Practical Examples
- Traditional Finance Example: Real estate company with properties
- Calculation walkthrough:
- Book value of properties: $100M
- Appraised value: $120M
- Liabilities: $70M
- Equity value = 70M = $50M
- Interpretation: Market value exceeds book value by 20%
DeFi Application defi-application
Lending protocols with loan portfolios are the most natural candidates for asset-based valuation in DeFi. The formula is: Value = Collateral assets - Outstanding loans - Bad debt provisions. The advantage is fully transparent, on-chain asset values updated in real time. The challenge is that volatile collateral values can swing the NAV calculation significantly within hours — a pace of change that traditional asset-based models were not designed to handle.
Core Concepts Summary (80/20 Principle) exam-focus
Must-Know Concepts
- Gordon Growth Model: V₀ = D₁/(r-g) - Foundation of dividend discount models formula
- P/E Ratio: Price/Earnings - Most common valuation multiple
- Enterprise Value: Market Cap + Debt - Cash - Firm-level valuation metric
- Intrinsic vs Market Value: Determines buy/sell decisions
- Present Value Principle: All valuation derives from discounted cash flows
Quick Reference Table
| Concept | Formula | When to Use | DeFi Equivalent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gordon Model | D₁/(r-g) | Stable dividend growth | Token with stable rewards |
| P/E Ratio | Price/EPS | Profitable companies | Protocol P/E ratios |
| EV/EBITDA | EV/EBITDA | Cross-capital structure | Protocol EV/Revenue |
| Two-Stage DDM | Complex NPV | Changing growth rates | New protocol valuation |
| Asset-Based | Assets - Liabilities | Tangible assets | Lending protocol NAV |
Comprehensive Formula Sheet
Essential Formulas
1. Gordon Growth Model
V₀ = D₁/(r-g) = D₀(1+g)/(r-g)
Where: D₁ = next dividend, r = required return, g = growth rate
Used for: Valuing stocks with constant dividend growth
2. Two-Stage DDM
V₀ = Σ[D₀(1+gs)^t/(1+r)^t] + [Vn/(1+r)^n]
Where: gs = short-term growth, gL = long-term growth, n = high-growth periods
Used for: Companies with changing growth rates
3. FCFE Model
V₀ = Σ(FCFEt/(1+r)^t)
FCFE = CFO - FCInv + Net borrowing
Used for: Companies not paying dividends
4. Preferred Stock Valuation
V₀ = D/r (perpetual)
V₀ = Σ(D/(1+r)^t) + F/(1+r)^n (with maturity)
Used for: Fixed dividend securities
5. P/E from Fundamentals
P/E = Payout ratio/(r-g)
Used for: Justified P/E calculation
6. Enterprise Value
EV = Market Cap + Debt + Preferred - Cash
Used for: Firm-level valuation
7. Sustainable Growth
g = b × ROE
Where: b = retention rate = (1 - payout ratio)
Used for: Estimating growth rates
8. Required Return (CAPM)
r = Rf + β(Market Premium)
Used for: Calculating discount rates
HP 12C Calculator Sequences
Gordon Growth Model:
2.10 [ENTER] (D₁)
0.10 [ENTER] (r)
0.05 [-] (r-g)
[÷] Result: 42
Two-Stage DDM (Example: 3 years high growth):
[f] [FIN] Clear financial registers
0 [g] [CF₀] Initial investment
2.20 [g] [CFj] Year 1 dividend
2.42 [g] [CFj] Year 2 dividend
2.66 [g] [CFj] Year 3 dividend
44.38 [+] Add terminal value to Year 3
[g] [CFj] Total Year 3 cash flow
10 [g] [i] Discount rate
[f] [NPV] Present value
Preferred Stock:
5.50 [ENTER] Annual dividend
0.06 [÷] Divide by required return
Result: 91.67
P/E Calculation:
50 [ENTER] Stock price
2 [÷] Divide by EPS
Result: 25
Practice Problems
Basic Level (Understanding)
-
Problem: A stock pays a $3 annual dividend expected to grow at 4% forever. If the required return is 9%, what is the stock’s value?
- Given: D₀ = $3, g = 4%, r = 9%
- Find: Intrinsic value V₀
- Solution:
- D₁ = 3.12
- V₀ = 3.12 / 0.05 = $62.40
- Answer: The stock is worth $62.40
-
Problem: A company has a P/E ratio of 20 while the industry average is 15. Is it overvalued?
- Given: Company P/E = 20, Industry P/E = 15
- Find: Relative valuation
- Solution: Relative P/E = 20/15 = 1.33
- Answer: Trading at 33% premium to industry; may be overvalued unless justified by superior growth
Intermediate Level (Application)
-
Problem: Value a stock with high growth for 3 years then stable growth:
- Current dividend: $1
- Growth years 1-3: 15%
- Growth after year 3: 5%
- Required return: 12%
- Given: D₀ = $1, gs = 15%, gL = 5%, r = 12%, n = 3
- Find: Current value
- Solution:
- D₁ = 1.32, D₃ = $1.52
- D₄ = 1.60
- V₃ = 22.86
- V₀ = 1.32/1.12² + (22.86)/1.12³
- V₀ = 1.05 + 19.43
- Answer: Stock value is $19.43
-
Problem: Calculate EV/EBITDA for a company:
- Market cap: $500M
- Debt: $200M
- Cash: $50M
- EBITDA: $100M
- Solution:
- EV = 200M - 650M
- EV/EBITDA = 100M = 6.5x
- Answer: EV/EBITDA multiple is 6.5x
Advanced Level (Analysis)
- Problem: Compare three valuation approaches for a mature utility company:
- Given:
- Current dividend: $4
- Dividend growth: 3%
- Required return: 8%
- EPS: $5
- Industry P/E: 16
- Book value per share: $50
- Industry P/B: 1.5
- Find: Value using DDM, P/E, and P/B approaches
- Solution:
- DDM: V = 4.12/0.05 = $82.40
- P/E: V = 80.00
- P/B: V = 75.00
- Answer: DDM suggests 80, P/B suggests 75-82 range, indicating fair valuation confidence.
- Given:
DeFi Applications & Real-World Examples
Traditional Finance Context
- Institution Example: Pension funds use DDM for dividend aristocrats portfolio selection
- Market Application: Private equity firms use EV/EBITDA for leveraged buyout targets
- Historical Case: Warren Buffett’s value investing using intrinsic value vs market price
DeFi Parallels
- Protocol Implementation:
- Smart Contract Logic: Automated fee distribution based on token holdings
- Advantages:
- Real-time, transparent cash flows
- Programmable dividend policies
- No intermediary custody
- Limitations:
- High volatility in protocol revenues
- Regulatory uncertainty
- Smart contract risks
Case Studies
-
Uniswap Valuation Analysis case-study:
- Background: Leading DEX with $5B+ daily volume
- Analysis:
- P/S ratio: Market cap / Annual volume × fee rate
- P/E potential: If fee switch activated
- Comparable: Traditional exchange multiples
- Outcomes: Trading at premium to TradFi exchanges
- Lessons: Growth potential justifies premium
-
MakerDAO Asset-Based Valuation case-study:
- Background: CDP protocol with DAI stablecoin
- Analysis:
- Assets: Collateral in vaults
- Liabilities: DAI outstanding
- Surplus buffer: Protocol equity
- Outcomes: MKR value tied to surplus growth
- Lessons: Asset-based model appropriate for lending protocols
Common Pitfalls & Exam Tips
Frequent Mistakes
- Mistake 1: Using g ≥ r in Gordon model (produces negative/infinite values)
- How to avoid: Ensure growth rate is less than required return
- Mistake 2: Mixing trailing and forward multiples in comparisons
- How to avoid: Use consistent time periods across all companies
- Mistake 3: Forgetting to add terminal value in multi-stage models
- How to avoid: Always calculate and include terminal value in final period
Exam Strategy
- Time management: 90 seconds per valuation question
- Question patterns:
- Gordon model calculations (30% of valuation questions)
- Multiple comparisons (25%)
- Multi-stage DDM (20%)
- EV calculations (15%)
- Conceptual (10%)
- Quick checks:
- Ensure g < r for Gordon model
- Verify P/E makes economic sense (typically 10-30x)
- Check unit consistency in calculations
Key Takeaways
Essential Points
✓ Intrinsic value vs market price determines investment decisions ✓ Gordon model (V = D₁/(r-g)) is foundation for dividend valuation ✓ Multiple approaches (DCF, multiples, asset-based) provide valuation triangulation ✓ P/E relates to fundamentals through payout ratio and growth ✓ Enterprise value enables cross-capital structure comparisons
Memory Aids
- Mnemonic: “GoRDon” - Growth Rate must be less than Discount rate
- Visual: Valuation pyramid - DCF at base (most fundamental), multiples in middle (practical), asset-based at top (fallback)
- Analogy: Valuation like home appraisal - use comparable sales (multiples), replacement cost (asset-based), and rental income (DCF)
Cross-References & Additional Resources
Related Topics
- Prerequisite: Quantitative Methods (Time Value of Money)
- Related: Financial Statement Analysis (for inputs), Portfolio Management (for required returns)
- Advanced: Fixed Income Valuation (similar present value concepts)
- Cross-section: Corporate Issuers (Capital Structure, payout policy)
Source Materials
- Primary Reading: Volume 5, Equity Investments, Topic 8
- Key Sections: Gordon Model derivation, Multiple regression analysis
- Practice Questions: End-of-chapter problems focus on DDM calculations
External Resources
- Videos: Aswath Damodaran valuation lectures (YouTube)
- Articles: McKinsey Valuation publications
- Tools:
- Financial calculators with NPV functions
- DeFi analytics platforms (DeFiLlama, Dune Analytics)
- Token Terminal for protocol P/E ratios
Review Checklist
Before moving on, ensure you can:
- Calculate intrinsic value using Gordon growth model in under 30 seconds
- Identify when to use constant vs multi-stage growth models
- Compute P/E, P/B, P/S, and P/CF multiples from financial data
- Calculate enterprise value and derive equity value
- Explain the relationship between P/E and fundamentals (payout, growth, risk)
- Apply valuation concepts to DeFi protocols and tokens
- Determine if a security is over/under/fairly valued given price and intrinsic value
- List advantages and disadvantages of each valuation approach
- Value preferred stock as a perpetuity
- Adjust for stock splits and stock dividends in valuations